Site icon Simporter

What Brands Can Do If Red Dyes Are Banned

Large photo for a red dye ban article, with rebranded red-dye free Skittles, Yoplait, Ocean Spray, Gatorade, and Welch's packagings.

Tell Me More About the Red Dye Ban

Red food dyes, especially Red Dye No. 3 and Red Dye No. 40, are getting attention because the FDA might soon take action. These synthetic dyes, made from petroleum, are found in many foods like candy, drinks, and snacks.

At a Senate meeting, Jim Jones, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for human foods, said the agency is reviewing a petition to ban Red Dye No. 3. A decision could come within weeks. This follows California’s move to ban Red Dye No. 3 from public school foods by 2027, which has put more pressure on the FDA to act.

Some lawmakers and experts are pushing for a ban, arguing that artificial dyes might harm children. Congressman Frank Pallone Jr. called Red Dye No. 3 “frightening” and urged the FDA to take action during the holiday season when colorful treats are everywhere. Critics like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for health secretary, have also questioned the safety of food dyes and their role in American diets.

While food dyes are approved for use by the FDA, their safety has been debated for years. Studies suggest these dyes might cause hyperactivity in sensitive children, but the FDA hasn’t found conclusive proof. In other countries, like those in the European Union, stricter rules require warning labels on foods with artificial dyes. Some dyes used in U.S. food are even banned entirely overseas.

The conversation around food dyes is about more than just color. It’s about the balance between safety, science, and how much risk people are willing to take for something that simply makes food look more appealing.

Five Ideas for How Brands Can Turn This Into an Opportunity

If red dyes in food are banned, companies will have to make some big changes. Here are five simple ideas for how brands can rebrand or reformulate their products.

Clear Drinks with Colored Bottles

Brands can make drinks clear and rely on colorful packaging instead of dyes. For example, Sprite’s soda is clear, but it comes in a green bottle, so it still feels vibrant and fresh. Drinks like fruit punch could follow the same approach, with a red-tinted bottle giving the illusion of color without using dye.

Switch to Natural Dyes Like Beet Juice

Natural ingredients, like beet juice, can replace artificial dyes. Beet juice gives foods and drinks a pretty pink or red color and is safe to consume. However, these natural alternatives can be pricier, which might mean slightly higher costs for products.

Embrace Neutral Colors

Not all foods need bright colors to be appealing. Brands can lean into natural, earthy tones to emphasize health and simplicity. For example, pink candy could turn white or light brown, and yogurt could go for a soft, natural peach hue.

Highlight the “No Dye” Trend

This could be a chance for brands to show their commitment to health. Products labeled “No Artificial Colors” or “Dye-Free” can attract families looking for safer and more natural options. It’s a simple way to turn a challenge into a marketing win.

Add Fun Without Color

Instead of focusing on color, brands can use creative shapes or patterns to make their products exciting. Imagine red chips being replaced with swirl-shaped snacks made from natural ingredients. This keeps the fun factor while ditching the dyes.

How Do People Feel About a Red Dye Ban?

Most people probably wouldn’t notice a big difference if Red Dye No. 3 were banned. Foods would still taste the same and companies would just use different colors.

Some people think this is a good idea. One person on Reddit said, “Good. It’ll all taste the exact same anyway, and I miss Crystal Pepsi.”

Others believe this shows how far behind America is compared to other countries. A Reddit user wrote, “It is weird how much stuff flies in America but is banned in Europe.”

But not everyone agrees that banning food dyes will change much. One critic joked, “Outlawing food dyes will revolutionize American diets? The stupid is truly everywhere.”

Another wrote, “Most foods would just use natural or new dyes to replace Red Dye No. 3. People probably wouldn’t even notice the switch, just like when Kraft changed their Mac and Cheese color.”

How 5 Brands Could Grow From the Red Dye Ban

Gatorade (Fruit Punch Flavor)

Current: Gatorade uses bright red for flavors like Fruit Punch.

Rebrand: Make the drink clear and use a bright red bottle or cap to signal the flavor.

Skittles (The Red One)

Current: Skittles relies on colorful red coatings.

Rebrand: Use beet juice for a natural red color.

Yoplait Strawberry Yogurt

Current: Yoplait Strawberry Yogurt uses artificial red dye to enhance its pinkish hue..

Rebrand: Keep it a light, natural strawberry color without any dyes and market it as “natural and wholesome.”

Welch’s Fruit Snacks

Current: Mixed fruit snacks include bright red pieces that rely on artificial dyes.

Rebrand: Use natural fruit extracts to create subtle, more authentic red tones. Highlight “made with real fruit” on the packaging to emphasize the natural shift while retaining the fun and vibrant feel.

Ocean Spray Cranberry Juice

Current: Cranberry juice is artificially dyed to maintain its deep red color.

Rebrand: Shift to natural alternatives, such as elderberry extract, to maintain its bold red appearance. Update messaging to promote “100% natural ingredients” and “authentic cranberry flavor,” keeping the juice visually appealing and trustworthy.

Would a Dye Ban Really Change Much?

A ban on Red Dye No. 3—or any artificial dye—is unlikely to “revolutionize American diets.” The changes would likely be minor, mostly affecting visual presentation rather than the food itself. Here’s a closer look at why:

Foods Would Stay the Same, Just Slightly Different Colors

When Kraft switched to natural coloring in its boxed Mac and Cheese, the product kept the same orange hue and flavor. Most consumers didn’t notice the change, though it likely complicated the supply chain and added some costs.

Similarly, if red dyes are banned, processed foods would adapt by using other, non-banned dyes or natural alternatives. The look might change slightly, but the products themselves would remain largely the same.

FDA’s Ability to Ban Dyes Faces Challenges

The FDA’s authority to ban dyes is not as straightforward as it once was. A Supreme Court ruling in June 2024 overturned the Chevron defense, requiring courts to independently judge whether agencies act within their statutory authority.

This legal hurdle means the FDA might need Congress to pass legislation to enforce a ban, which could take years and face significant opposition in a divided political environment.

There Are Alternatives for Every Dye

If Red Dye No. 3 is banned, companies have plenty of options to replace it. Natural dyes like beet juice or carmine can mimic the red color, while spirulina is a common choice for blue hues.

The result? Foods would look almost the same, but production costs might rise slightly due to the need for new ingredients and processes.

FDA Could Be Weakened by a New Administration

With the Trump administration critical of federal regulation and the Department of Government Efficiency looking to make large scale budget cuts, the FDA’s authority could be further reduced. If this happens, bans or restrictions on dyes could become less likely.

Uncertainty about regulatory enforcement might lead companies to delay reformulations until clear guidance emerges.

Closing Thought

A ban on Red Dye No. 3 would symbolize a shift in how the food industry balances safety, consumer demand, and regulation. While the practical impact on products may be minimal—mostly limited to subtle changes in appearance—it raises larger questions about the role of artificial additives in our diets and the future of food regulation in the U.S.

For brands, this could be an opportunity to embrace transparency and innovation, appealing to consumers who increasingly value natural ingredients. At the same time, the debate highlights the need for stronger scientific research and clear policy direction to ensure public trust in the food system.

Ultimately, the outcome of this discussion isn’t just about one dye. It’s about setting the tone for how the industry navigates health, regulation, and consumer expectations in the years to come.

Exit mobile version